Introduction

 

The government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is taking considerable steps toward the support of more environmental-friendly farming systems. One such system is organic farming, which the Saudi government is actively encouraging the private sector to adopt for the production of safe and healthy foods (Hartmann et al. 2012). The total area of organically farmed land is approximately 35,000 ha, and future increases are expected (Hartmann et al. 2012). Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is one of the most important organic crops in Saudi Arabia, with an annual production of approximately 306,000 tons (FAO 2017). However, Fusarium wilt, a devastating disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. spp. lycopersici (FOL), leads to extensive losses in tomato yield under both greenhouse and open field conditions (El_Komy et al. 2016). Under optimal infection conditions, yield losses can reach 90% (Hibar et al. 2006). Controlling tomato wilt disease using standard chemical methods is challenging; furthermore, this mode of control is restricted in organic farming (Finckh et al. 2015). Biological control with antagonistic microorganisms offers a promising and alternative strategy to manage tomato wilt disease without the deleterious environmental effects of chemical treatments (El_Komy et al. 2016). Inoculation with certain strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), such as Bacillus subtilis, can protect plants from damaging soil-borne pathogens and promote plant growth via different mechanisms, including competition for nutrients and space, production of antifungal volatile organic compounds, antibiotics and fungal cell wall-degrading enzymes, and enhancement of plant resistance to pathogens (Kloepper et al. 2004; Bouizgarne 2013; Jangir et al. 2018).

Despite the proven effectiveness of certain rhizobacterial inoculants for the control of plant diseases and improvement of productivity, their successful application in commercial agricultural has been hampered by multiple constraints. Indeed, the efficiency of rhizobacteria is influenced by environmental conditions (Shirinbayan et al. 2019). Saudi Arabia is one of the world’s arid regions. The cultivated soils in such regions are characterized by harsh environmental conditions, including lack of soil moisture and poor fertility represented in the lower contents of organic matter, as well as the higher contents of calcium carbonate and salinity (Hussain et al. 2010). However, such ecosystems have a diversity of microbes that are adapted to harsh environmental conditions (Soussi et al. 2016). Thus, identification of native rhizobacterial strains that are naturally adapted to harsh arid ecosystems may further lead to development of effective and sustainable cropping systems (Shirinbayan et al. 2019).

Root colonization by rhizobacteria and their persistence in the rhizosphere are major challenges in the implementation of biocontrol strategies (Abdallah et al. 2018). Poor root colonization and inadequate antagonistic metabolite production can account for some of the variations in the activity of antagonistic inoculants during the crop growing season (Bouizgarne 2013; Abdallah et al. 2018). Amendment of soil with organic substrates in combination with biocontrol strains can increase both the survival of rhizobacterial strains and their colonization of the soil near plant roots (Gava and Pinto 2016). Moreover, certain types of compost can naturally suppress disease. Therefore, the use of compost as a substrate for biocontrol applications would offer additional advantages (Termorshuizen et al. 2006; Gava and Pinto 2016).

Biological control may be an effective strategy to protect tomato plants against FOL (Jangir et al. 2018); however, novel microbial control agents that are native to specific arid conditions need to be identified. In fact, the application of exotic biocontrol agents might disrupt the local ecosystem and have detrimental ecological effects on the native rhizospheric microbial populations (Figueroa-López et al. 2016). In addition, exotic biocontrol agents might not remain active under all soil environments and in all agricultural ecosystems (Schmidt et al. 2004). Hence, this study aimed to select a native rhizobacterial strain against FOL in vitro and evaluate its effectiveness, either alone or in combination with organic compost, in reducing tomato wilt disease and inducing plant defense responses in vivo. This study was designed to develop an approach using a native rhizobacterial strain to control FOL and improve organic farming practices in arid regions.

 

Materials and Methods

 

Fungal pathogen

 

In this study, a pathogenic strain of F. oxysporum f. spp. lycopersici (FOL-30) was obtained from the collection of the Department of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University. The pathogen was isolated from roots of tomato plants showing typical symptoms of Fusarium wilt. Koch’s postulates were performed to confirm the pathogenicity. The pathogen was further identified morphologically and microscopically according to the criteria of Leslie and Summerell (2006), as well as molecularly by sequencing translation elongation factor 1 α (tef1α) and ITS-rRNA genes (Saleh et al. 2017). The fungal culture was revived on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) at 28°C after incubation for 7 days and maintained on PDA by subculturing at regular intervals.

 

Isolation and identification of bacterial antagonists

 

Rhizobacteria were isolated from the rhizosphere of healthy tomato plants grown in the Al-Kharj region of Saudi Arabia through serial dilution plating on nutrient agar media (NA; Difco Laboratories). Colonies with different characteristics were selected and grown separately. The isolated bacteria were initially identified on the basis of their morphological and physiological characteristics (Bergey et al. 1974), as well as by using the Biolog system (Biolog Inc., Hayward, C.A.). Molecular identification of rhizobacterial cultures was performed by isolating genomic DNA using a standard protocol (Sambrook et al. 1989). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using PCR and the 27F (5ʹ-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3ʹ) and 1492R (5'-TACGGYTACCTTGTTA CGACTT-3') universal primers (Heuer et al. 1997). The PCR conditions were as follows: 10 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 1 min at 55°C and 1.5 min at 72°C, with a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The amplified products were sequenced by the Advanced Genetic Technologies Center (AGTC), College of Agricultural Sciences of the University of Kentucky (http://www.uky.edu/Centers/AGTC/). These DNA sequences were identified by comparison with nucleotide sequences deposited in GenBank using Bioedit software (Hall 1999; http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/Bioedit/bioedit.html).

 

The In vitro antagonistic activity

 

Dual culture assay: The bacterial strains were screened for antifungal activity against FOL-30 by using the dual culture assay of Müller et al. (2018), with some modifications. Briefly, two straight lines, 5 cm long and 2 cm from the edge of a PDA plate, were streaked using a loop full of cells from a freshly growing bacterial culture (24 h old). The plates were incubated at 28°C for 48 h before fungal inoculation. A 4 mm diameter mycelial disc from a 7-day-old fungal culture was placed in the central position between the two lines, 1.5 cm from the streaks. Plates without bacterial antagonists served as controls. Five replicates were prepared for each treatment. Plates were incubated at 28°C and observed daily for 7 days. The percentage of fungal growth inhibition was determined by [(R1 R2)/R1] × 100, where R1 and R2 are the radii of the pathogen colonies in the control and dual-culture plates, respectively. Signs of stress in pathogen hyphae because of the antagonistic effects of rhizobacterial strains were evaluated microscopically.

Bacterial culture filtrate assay: Rhizobacterial strains were grown in NA at 28°C for 48 h. A single colony of bacterial cultures was incubated in 100 mL of nutrient broth with continuous shaking for 72 h at 28°C. The cultures were centrifuged at 5000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant was vacuum-filtered through a 0.22 μm sterile membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA; Li et al. 2008). The resulting culture filtrate was added at the concentration of 15% (v/v) to molten PDA media containing the appropriate amount of agar to ensure the plates gelled properly. Plates containing the medium mixed with sterile water only were used as controls. The plates were inoculated in the center with a 0.5 cm plug from the leading edge of a 5-day-old PDA culture of FOL-30. Five replicates were prepared for each treatment, and the plates were incubated at 28°C and observed daily for 7 days. Mycelial growth was measured, and the percentage of growth inhibition was calculated as described above (Jangir et al. 2018).

 

Greenhouse experiments

 

The results of antagonistic experiments suggested that Bacillus subtilis KSU-110 was the most promising strain and it was selected for further testing of its biocontrol potential, both individually and/or in combination with organic compost, against Fusarium wilt disease under greenhouse conditions.

 

Plant growth conditions

 

Seeds of Farah tomatoes, a common FOL-susceptible greenhouse cultivar in Saudi Arabia, were surface-sterilized by immersion in 1% sodium hypochlorite for 30 s and then washed thrice with sterile distilled water. The seeds were pre-germinated for 3 days in Petri dishes containing sterile distilled water at 28°C. Germinated seeds were then sown in 15 cm pots containing an autoclaved mixture of potting soil, peat moss, and perlite (2:1:1, v/v/v). Plants were grown in a growth chamber with 70% relative humidity and a photoperiod of 12 h light at 26°C and 12 h dark at 20°C. Plants were fertilized weekly with a 20-20-20 (N-P-K) soluble fertilizer (1 g/L) and the seedlings were irrigated with tap water as needed. Subsequent experiments were performed when four leaves had completely expanded (6 weeks old).

 

Microbial inoculum preparation

 

Fungal inocula were prepared by culturing FOL-30 on PDA plates for 2 weeks at 28°C in the dark. Fungal colonies were subsequently scraped from PDA plates using a sterile glass rod to dislodge spores into sterile distilled water. Fungal hyphae and residue were removed by filtering the suspension through four layers of gauze. Spores were counted using a hemocytometer, and the conidial suspension was adjusted to 1 × 107 conidia per milliliter. For antagonistic bacterial inocula, a suspension of the KSU-110 strain was obtained from overnight cultures incubated on NA at 28°C. Bacterial cells were scraped off the agar plate into 10 mM magnesium sulfate buffer, centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 min, and resuspended in sterile distilled water. The bacterial cell concentration was adjusted to 1 × l07 colony forming units (cfus) per milliliter by measuring the OD660 (optical density at 660 nm) spectrophotometrically (Youssef et al. 2016).

 

Compost material

 

The sterilized organic compost (Al-Reef Organic Fertilizers Factory, Co., Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Riyadh) used in this study consisted of cow manure and vegetable material, with the former being the major component and the latter representing only 20% of the amendment. The compost had the following major physicochemical characteristics: pH 6.3, 1% nitrogen, 91.8% organic matter, 78.3% carbon and a 37.3 C: N ratio. It is commercially available in Saudi Arabia.

 

Control of fusarium wilt in tomatoes using the combination of the KSU-110 strain and compost

 

A pot experiment was conducted in the greenhouse of the Plant Protection Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University. Pots were arranged in a completely randomized design with eight treatments: (T1) non-infested soil (healthy control), (T2) non-infested soil amended with KSU-110, (T3) non-infested soil with compost, (T4) non-infested soil with KSU-110 and compost, (T5) soil infested with FOL-30, (T6) soil infested with FOL-30 amended with compost, (T7) soil infested with FOL-30 and amended with KSU-110, and (T8) soil infested with FOL-30 and amended with KSU-110 and compost. Each treatment consisted of 30 replicates, with one plant per replicate (pot).

Plastic pots (15 cm in diameter) were filled with a sterilized mixture of sand, clay and soil (1:1:1, v/v). The compost treatments were incorporated into the potting mixture at a rate of 25% (v/v). The conidial suspensions of the wilt pathogen were incorporated into each pot to ensure a final concentration of 1 × 103 conidia per gram of soil to promote disease development. Pots inoculated with an equal volume of distilled water served as controls. One week after soil infestation with FOL-30 inocula, tomato seedling roots were dipped into a bacterial suspension (1 × 107 cfu mL−1) for 30 min and then transferred to pots, with one tomato seedling per pot. The seedlings were placed in a greenhouse maintained at 28°C with 50–70% relative humidity and a 12:12 h light-dark photoperiod. At 45 days after transplanting (DAT), 15 plants from each treatment were arbitrarily selected for biomass analysis and disease scoring. The experiment was repeated twice.

Incidence and severity of fusarium wilt disease

 

Plants were examined for the incidence and severity of Fusarium wilt after 45 DAT. Disease incidence (DI) was calculated as DI = (number of diseased plants/total number of plants) × 100. Disease severity (DS) was evaluated using two different disease rating scales (1–5); one was based on foliar symptoms as proposed by (Hibar et al. 2006) and the other was based on vascular browning (Horinouchi et al. 2008). Disease scores were converted to DS using the following formula: DS = [(A × 1) + (B × 2) + (C × 3) + (D × 4) + (E × 5) ]/(total number of plants) × 100, where, A, B, C, D, and E are the number of plants corresponding to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 disease rating scores, respectively. Control efficiency (%CE) for each treatment was calculated using the estimates of DI and DS in control and treated plants (D1 and D2, respectively) using the following formula: CE = [(D1D2)/D1] × 100.

The synergistic interaction of KSU-110 + compost in controlling wilt disease was estimated according to Abbott’s formulae (Levy et al. 1986). The expected control efficiency (Pexp12) for the combined application was calculated using the formula: Pexp12 = (P1 + P2) – (P1 × P2)/100, where P1 and P2 are the P data observed for the single application of KSU-110 and compost, respectively. The observed protection efficiency (Pobs) was estimated from the P data for the combined application. The synergism factor (SF) was estimated using the formula: SF = (Pobs/Pexp12). As a decision rule, SF > 1 indicated the interaction was synergistic, SF = 1 indicated the interaction was additive, and SF < 1 indicated the interaction was antagonistic (Levy et al. 1986).

 

Plant growth measurements

 

At the end of the experiment, length (cm) and dry weight (g; oven dried at 80°C for 72 h) of the root and shoot systems of each plant were measured separately. The improvement efficiency (%IM) was calculated using the following formula: [(C - T)/C] × 100; where, C and T are the growth parameters of control and treated plants, respectively. The synergistic interaction of KSU-110 + compost in promoting plant growth was estimated, as described above.

 

Assay of defense enzymes

 

Root samples of three plants from each treatment were collected at 15, 30, and 45 DAT (three replicates per time interval for each treatment). The roots were washed, briefly dried, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, stored at −80°C, and maintained separately for biochemical analysis representing three biological replications. Plant tissues were ground into a fine powder under liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. The fine powder was suspended in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 4°C (1 mL g-1 leaf tissue). The solution was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min. The supernatant was collected and used as a crude enzyme extract to assay peroxidase (POD) spectrophotometrically by measuring the oxidation of pyrogallol in the presence of H2O2 as OD425 and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) as OD575 (Tuzun et al. 1989).

 

Monitoring FOL-30 and KSU-110 in the tomato rhizosphere

 

KSU-110 and FOL-30 populations in the soil were monitored by collecting rhizosphere samples at 15, 30, and 45 DAT. A 1 g rhizosphere soil sample (four replicates per time interval for each treatment) was suspended in 9 mL of sterilized/ distilled water and vortexed at the maximum speed for 5 min. Next, a 1:200 soil dilution was spread onto plates containing Komada’s selective medium for FOL-30 (Komada, 1975) and NA medium for KSU-110. After incubation at 28°C for 48 h, the number of cfus of FOL-30 and KSU-110 per gram of rhizosphere soil was recorded. Re-isolated bacteria showing morphological similarities to KSU-110 were identified using the Biolog system to confirm the association of the applied strain with the rhizosphere samples. The pathogen reduction efficiency (%RE) was calculated using the following formula: [(C - T)/C] × 100; where, C and T are the FOL populations in infected control and treated rhizosphere soils, respectively. The synergistic interaction of KSU-110 + compost in the reduction of the FOL population was estimated at intervals, as described above.

 

Field experiments

 

Experiments were conducted in a field naturally infested with FOL at the Experimental Farm of the College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University. This field was naturally highly infested with the wilt pathogen during the previous season. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized block design with four treatments (T5, T6, T7 and T8) and was replicated six times, with 15 plants per replicate. For the experimental treatments, tomato plants were treated with KSU-110 and compost as described above. At the end of the experiment (45 DAT), ten plants were arbitrarily selected from each replicate and used to evaluate the % DI and % DS. Furthermore, the dry weight and length of the root and shoot systems for each plant were recorded at 45 DAT as described above. The synergistic interactions of KSU-110 + compost in promoting plant growth and controlling wilt disease were estimated, as described above.

 

Statistical analysis

 

All experiments were repeated twice. The analyses did not indicate any significant differences between the two repeats of the treatments; hence, the results from the duplicate tests were combined for the final analysis. All the data are presented as mean values (average of two experiments). All analysis of variance tests were conducted using SAS Version 9.1 software (SAS Institute Inc 2003). The data for disease measurements were analyzed following an arcsine transformation. The population data were transformed with a square-root [sqrt (x + 0.5)] transformation before analysis to obtain homogeneity of variances (Gomez and Gomez 1984). The least significant difference at P < 0.05 was applied to detect differences between treatments (Gomez and Gomez 1984).

Table 1: List of rhizobacterial strains identified on a molecular basis and their GenBank accession numbers

 

Strain code

Strain identified

GenBank Accession No.

KSU-18

Pseudomonas spp.

MN208459

KSU-67

Pseudomonas spp.

MN208458

KSU-25

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

MN208460

KSU-87

Stenotrophomonas spp.

MN208462

KSU-E3

Stenotrophomonas spp.

MN208463

KSU-B3

Enterobacter spp.

MN208461

KSU-191

Achromobacter spanius

MN208464

KSU-B17

Bacillus spp.

MN208475

KSU-XR

Bacillus spp.

KY123A56

KSU-06

B. cereus

MN208465

KSU-103

B. megaterium

MN208466

KSU-A7

B. pumilus

MN208469

KSU-12

B. safensis

MN208467

KSU-31

B. amyloliquefaciens

MN208468

KSU-2.2

B. pumilus

MN208474

KSU-Y1

B. subtilis

MN208472

KSU-50

B. subtilis

MN208470

KSU-110

B. subtilis

MN208473

KSU-B2

B. subtilis

MN208476

KSU-43

B. subtilis

MN208471

 

 

Fig. 1: Percentage mean inhibition of FOL-30 growth by the rhizobacterial strains obtained using a dual culture plate assay (A) and bacterial culture filtrate (B) after six days of inoculation at 28 ± 1°C. Each bar represents the average of two experiments with five replicates per treatment per experiment. Percentage inhibition data were analyzed after arcsine transformation. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to the LSD test

 

Results

 

Isolation and identification of fungal pathogens and bacterial antagonists

 

The results of culture morphology and microscopic examination revealed that the FOL-30 strain was F. oxysporum. In addition, the tef1α and rDNA-ITS sequences confirmed the identity of the FOL-30 strain. The tef1α and rDNA-ITS sequences of FOL-30 were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers MN514860 and MN508482, respectively.

Twenty rhizobacterial strains were isolated from the rhizosphere of commercial tomato fields. The 16S rRNA gene-based analysis showed that 13 rhizobacterial strains belonged to the genus Bacillus (Table 1). Eleven were assigned to a species, whereas two were identified only to the genus level. The remaining strains belonged to the genera Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Enterobacter, and Achromobacter (Table 1).

 

In vitro antagonistic activity

 

All the strains were significantly antagonistic to FOL-30 (P < 0.05) and inhibited its growth (Fig. 1). However, these antagonistic responses varied by strain (Fig. 1). In the dual culture plate assay, the highest level of antagonistic activity against FOL-30 was observed for B. subtilis strain KSU-110 (68%; Fig. 1–2). This strain induced distortions and deformations in FOL-30 mycelia, including increased branching, hyphal swelling, and cytoplasm collapse. Moreover, the KSU-110 culture filtrate had the greatest inhibitory activity toward pathogen growth (46%) among all the rhizobacterial culture filtrates (Fig. 1).

 

Incidence and severity of fusarium wilt disease

 

The highest mean DI and DS values (P < 0.05) were detected in tomato plants grown in the presence of FOL alone (Table 2). Application of KSU-110 and compost, either separately or in combination, significantly (P < 0.05) reduced disease development compared to that of infected control plants (Table 2). Indeed, compared to the infected control, the combined rhizobacteria + organic compost treatment resulted in the largest reduction in DI (71%), DS based on foliar symptoms (63%), and stem discoloration (69%; Table 2). However, the control efficiency for the tomato plants treated with KSU-110 was higher than that of plants treated with organic compost (Table 2). According to Abbott’s formulae, the interaction of KSU-110 with compost was synergistic (SF > 1) in the reduction of tomato wilt disease (Table 2).

 

Plant growth measurements

 

Plant growth parameters were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in tomato plants infected with FOL-30 compared with those of non-infected controls (Table 3). In FOL-30-infested soil, tomato plants treated with the antagonistic bacteria along with organic compost showed the greatest increase in root and shoot length (68 and 58%, respectively), as well as root and shoot dry weight (50 and 66%, respectively) compared to those of the infected control plants (Table 3). However, treatment with KSU-110 or compost alone also significantly (P < 0.05) improved the growth of pathogen-infected plants (Table 3). Regardless of the presence or absence of FOL-30, the combined effect of KSU-110 + organic was synergistic (SF > 1) in most plant growth measurements (Table 3).

Table 2: The effects of Bacillus subtilis strain KSU-110 and organic compost applied alone or in combination on tomato wilt incidence, foliar symptoms, and discoloration severity caused by the Fusarium wilt pathogen under greenhouse conditions

 

Treatments

Wilt incidence (%)a

(%CE)b

Foliar symptoms (%)a

(%CE)b

Discoloration (%)a

(%CE)b

FOL (infected control)

92.4 a

-

50.0 a

-

48.2  a

-

FOL + compost

75.8 b

17.9

38.0 b

24.0

29.5 b

38.8

FOL+ KSU-110

56.1 c

39.3

24.8 c

50.4

26.7 b

44.6

FOL+ compost + KSU-110

26.4 d

71.4

18.3  c

63.4

15.2 c

68.5

Synergism factor c

1.43

1.02

1.05

a Each value represents the average of two experiments with 15 replicates for each treatment per experiment

b The control efficiency (%CE) was calculated according to the following formula: [(D1 D2)/D1] × 100; where, D1 and D2 are the disease measurements of the control and treated plants, respectively

c The synergism factor (SF) was estimated using the following formula: SF = (Pobs /Pexp); where, Pobs and Pexp are the observed and expected protection efficiency achieved by the combined application, respectively

- Values in each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to the LSD test

 

Activity of defense enzymes

 

Infection of tomato plants with the wilt pathogen resulted in significant increases in POD and PPO enzyme activities (Fig. 3). The activities of POD (1.5- to 2.2-fold increases in absorbance per minute per gram of root tissue) and PPO (2.4- to 2.8-fold increases in absorbance per min per gram of root tissue) significantly (P < 0.05) increased in infected plants (Fig. 3). The activities of both enzymes were greater in KSU-110- and/or compost-treated tomato plants than in the non-treated, infected plants (Fig. 3). Treating tomato plants with KSU-110 + compost resulted in significantly (P < 0.05) higher POD (1.3- to 1.45-fold increases in absorbance) and PPO (1.1- to 1.26-fold increases in absorbance) activities than those in plants treated with FOL-30 only (Fig. 3).

 

Monitoring of FOL-30 and KSU-110 in the tomato rhizosphere

 

 

Fig. 2: Dual culture assay of B. subtilis strain KSU-110 and FOL-30 on PDA after 6 days of incubation at 28 ± 1°C (B). The control B-1 plate was inoculated only with FOL-30. Plate B-2 shows the antagonistic action of KSU-110 against FOL-30

 

 

Fig. 3: Changes in peroxidase (POD) (A) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (B) activities in root tissues of FOL-infected tomato plants treated with Bacillus subtilis strain KSU-110 and organic compost, applied either singly or in combination at 15, 30, and 45 days after transplanting. Each bar represents the average of two experiments with three replicates per treatment per experiment. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to the LSD test. Error bars represent the standard deviations of the mean

KSU-110 efficiently colonized the tomato rhizosphere and persisted at high levels for up to 45 DAT (range from 9.7 × 104 to 12.3 × 104 cfu g−1 of rhizosphere soil at 45 DAT; Table 4). However, the highest level of KSU-110 colonization occurred in the composted soil (Table 4). The pathogen population increased over time in the FOL-30-only infested (control) soil (from 2.2 × 105 to 5.0 × 105 cfu g−1 of rhizosphere soil; Table 4). At 45 DAT, the FOL-30 populations were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) by 94–99.6% in the tomato rhizosphere treated with KSU-110 and/or organic compost compared to that in soil treated only with FOL-30 (Table 4). The FOL-30 population decreased in the soil of plants treated with KSU-110, the population of which increased markedly over time (Table 4). In terms of FOL reduction efficiency, the mean synergy factor calculated over study intervals was 0.98 (Table 4). This value did not significantly differ according to the one-tailed t test (P > 0.05).

 

Field experiments

 

The greatest protection against wilt disease was noted in tomato plants treated with a combination of KSU-110 and organic compost, for which the disease incidence, foliar symptom severity, and internal stem discoloration were reduced by 60, 67 and 56%, respectively (Table 5). The same application led to significant increases (P < 0.05) in root and shoot length (44 and 55%, respectively), as well as root and shoot dry weight (66 and 84%, respectively), compared to those of the non-treated control (Table 6). Application of either KSU-110 or compost alone was next in degree of effectiveness, significantly suppressing wilt disease and improving plant growth (P < 0.05; Tables 5 and 6). In general, the combined KSU-110 + organic compost treatment resulted in synergistic effects (SF > 1) in the control of wilt disease and promotion of tomato growth (Table 5 and 6).

 

Discussion

 

Selecting native PGPR strains that are well adapted to Saudi ecosystems is a requisite step towards improving the efficacy of managing tomato wilt disease under organic farming conditions. In the present study, we identified 20 rhizobacterial strains from the tomato rhizosphere and screened them for their antagonistic potential against FOL-30 in vitro. All rhizobacterial strains had significant antifungal activity against the wilt pathogen and inhibited its growth. B. subtilis strain KSU-110 had the highest antagonistic activity against FOL-30. This strain also induced distortions and deformations in the mycelia of the pathogen, including increased hyphal branching, swelling, and cytoplasm collapse. The antagonistic responses observed in the in vitro tests suggested that the selected KSU-110 strain could release antifungal substances that restricted pathogen growth. Direct antagonism of pathogenic fungi because of antibiosis (e.g., antibiotics, lytic enzymes, and volatile organic compounds) is one of the biocontrol mechanisms used by the soil Bacillus strains (Ahemad and Kibret 2014; Grobelak et al. 2015). This could provide a potential basis for selecting antagonistic strains for biological control under field conditions (Bubici et al. 2019).

Table 5: The effects of Bacillus subtilis strain KSU-110 and organic compost applied alone or in combination on tomato wilt incidence, foliar symptoms, and discoloration severity caused by the Fusarium wilt pathogen under field conditions

 

Treatments

Wilt incidence (%)a

(%CE)b

Foliar symptoms (%)a

(%CE)b

Discoloration (%)a

(%CE)b

FOL (infected control)

66.0 a

-

32.6  a

-

25.5 a

-

FOL + compost

50.5 b

23.4

20.0 b

38.7

19.3 b

24.3

FOL+ KSU-110

39.6 c

40.0

19.0 c

42.0

16.4 c

36.0

FOL+ compost + KSU-110

26.7 c

59.5

10.7 d

67.2

11.3 d

55.7

Synergism factorc

1.1

1.05

1.1

a Each value represents the average of two experiments with 15 replicates for each treatment per experiment

b The control efficiency (%CE) was calculated according to the following formula: [(D1 D2)/D1] × 100; where, D1 and D2 are the disease measurements of the control and treated plants, respectively

c The synergism factor (SF) was estimated using the following formula: SF = (Pobs /Pexp); where, Pobs and Pexp are the observed and expected protection efficiency achieved by the combined application, respectively

- Values in each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to the LSD test

 

Table 6: The effects of Bacillus subtilis strain KSU-110 and organic compost applied alone or in combination on the length and dry weights of both root and shoot systems of tomato plants infected with the Fusarium wilt pathogen under field conditions

 

Treatments

Length (cm)a

Dry weight (g)a

Root

(%IM)b

Shoot

(%IM)b

Root

(%IM)b

Shoot

(%IM)b

FOL (infected control)

10.7 c

-

37.8 c

-

3.7 b

-

12.5 d

-

FOL + compost

14.5 ab

35.4

50.8 b

34.4

5.9 b

60.5

19.9 b

37.3

FOL+ KSU-110

13.4 b

24.9

48.5 b

28.2

4.8ab

29.7

16.2 c

29.6

FOL+ compost + KSU-110

15.5 a

44.2

58.5 a

54.7

6.1 a

65.7

23.0 a

83.6

Synergism factorc

0.86

1.04

0.92

1.49

a Each value represents the average of two experiments with 15 replicates for each treatment per experiment

b The calculation of improvement efficiency (%IM) was according to the following formula: [(C - T)/C] × 100, where C and T are the growth parameters of control and treated plants, respectively

c The synergism factor (SF) was estimated using the following formula: SF = (IMobs /IMexp); where, IMobs and IMexp are the observed and expected improvement efficiency achieved by the combined application, respectively

- Values in each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to the LSD test

The addition of organic compost to the soil provided an environment-friendly method of managing soil-borne diseases, including FOL (Dukare et al. 2011; Hadar and Papadopoulou 2012; Bahramisharif et al. 2013; Gava and Pinto 2016). In the present study, we evaluated the hypothesis that the integrated combination of KSU-110 with compost could enhance the biological control efficacy against FOL because of additive or synergistic interactions. Our results showed that the application of KSU-110 and organic compost applied alone or in combination, significantly (P < 0.05) reduced disease development under greenhouse and field conditions. This suggested that the suppressive effects of KSU-110 detected in the in vitro antagonistic assays were linked to the management of Fusarium wilt disease in tomatoes in vivo. Interestingly, mixing KSU-110 with organic compost caused the highest reduction in DI and DS compared to that of the individual applications even under field conditions. Moreover, the observed control efficiency in tomato plants treated with KSU-100 + compost was higher than that expected (SF > 1), indicating a synergistic effect. This suggests that the application of KSU-110 + compost represents a promising option for organic growers of tomatoes. The synergistic disease suppression elicited by this combination could result from nutrients in the compost that enhance rhizobacterial competitive ability, or from the presence of specific agents that evoke an antibiosis effect or induce resistance against pathogen infection (Abbasi et al. 2002; Huang et al. 2011). Moreover, volatiles released during manure decomposition, such as sulfur-containing compounds, organic acids, and ammonia, may increase disease suppression (Coventry et al. 2006).

Table 3: The effects of Bacillus subtilis strain KSU-110 and organic compost applied alone or in combination on the length and dry weights of both root and shoot systems in tomato plants regardless of the presence or absence of the Fusarium wilt pathogen under greenhouse conditions

 

Treatments

Length (cm)a

Dry weight (g)a

Root

(%IM)b

Shoot

(%IM)b

Root

(%IM)b

Shoot

(%IM)b

Healthy control

7.1 bc

-

22.6 c

-

1.30 bc

-

3.90 cd

-

Compost

8.7 a

22.5

28.2 b

24.8

1.60 a

23.0

5.10 b

30.8

KSU-110

8.0 a

12.7

26.4 b

16.8

1.40 ab

07.7

4.70 bc

20.5

KSU-110 + compost

9.1 a

28.2

31.4 a

38.9

1.70 a

30.8

6.11 a

56.7

Synergism factorc

0.89

1.05

1.1

1.26

FOL (infected control)

3.7 e

-

10.3 f

-

0.68 e

-

1.93 g

-

FOL + compost

5.0 d

35.1

13.6 e

32.0

0.97 d

42.6

2.78 ef

44.0

FOL+ KSU-110

4.9 d

32.4

13.0 e

26.2

0.88 de

29.4

2.20 fg

14.0

FOL+ compost + KSU-110

6.2 c

67.6

16.3 d

58.3

1.02 cd

50.0

3.20 cd

65.8

Synergism factorc

1.21

1.17

0.85

1.27

a Each value represents the average of two experiments with 15 replicates for each treatment per experiment

b The improvement efficiency (%IM) was calculated using the following formula: [(C - T)/C] × 100; where, C and T are the growth parameters of control and treated plants, respectively. Values in normal font are the effects of different bio-organic treatments on plant growth parameters compared with those in the healthy control (no FOL stress). Values in bold font are the effects of different bio-organic treatments on plant growth parameters compared with those in the infected control (under FOL stress)

c The synergism factor (SF) was estimated using the following formula: SF = (IMobs /IMexp); where, IMobs and IMexp are the observed and expected improvement efficiency achieved by the combined application, respectively

- Values in each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to the LSD test

 

Table 4: Rhizosphere soil populations of Bacillus subtilis strain KSU-110 and Fusarium wilt pathogen strain FOL-30 (cfu g−1 of rhizosphere soil) sampled in the vicinity of tomato plants at 15, 30, 45 days after transplantation (DAT) under greenhouse conditions

 

Treatments

Population of KSU-110a

Population of FOL-30a

15 DAT

30 DAT

45 DAT

15 DAT

(%RE)b

30 DAT

(%RE)b

45 DAT

(%RE)b

KSU-110

6.0 × 104 e

7.7 × 104 d

9.8 × 104  c

-

 

-

 

-

 

KSU-110 + compost

7.7 × 104 d

10.0× 104 c

12.3 × 104 a

-

 

-

 

-

 

FOL

-

-

-

2.2 × 105 C

-

3.3 × 105 B

-

5.1 × 105 A

-

FOL + compost

-

-

-

3.1 × 104 D

85.9

3.5 × 104 D

89.4

3.2 × 104 D

93.7

FOL + KSU-110

4.5 × 104 f

6.5× 104 e

9.7× 104 c

3.0 × 104 D

86.4

3.2 × 104 D

90.3

3.4 × 104 D

93.3

FOL + compost + KSU-110

6.2 × 104 e

9.6 × 104 c

11.4 × 104 b

1.8 × 104 E

91.8

2.3 × 103 F

99.3

2.0 × 103 F

99.6

Synergism factorc

0.98

a Each value represents the average of two experiments with four replicates for each time point per experiment

b The pathogen reduction efficiency (%RE) was calculated using the following formula: [(C - T)/C] × 100; where, C and T are the FOL populations in infected control and treated rhizosphere soils, respectively

c The mean synergism factor (SF) was estimated using the following formula: SF = (Robs /Rexp); where, Robs and Rexp are the observed and expected FOL reduction efficiency achieved by the combined application at 15, 30, and 45 DAT

- Values followed by the same lowercase or uppercase letters are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to the LSD test

In addition to suppressing wilt disease, the application of KSU-110 and compost, either separately or in combination, had a positive growth-promoting effect on tomato seedlings under both greenhouse and field conditions. Application of KSU-110 and organic compost led to the highest (P < 0.05) increase in tomato growth parameters, irrespective of the presence or absence of the wilt pathogen. These effects may be attributed to the ability of Bacillus strains to promote plant growth and health by enhancing nutrient uptake from the soil by plant roots, as well as the synthesis of plant hormones (Grobelak et al. 2015). Moreover, the addition of organic compost to the soil probably improves the nutritional status of the plants and contributes to soil health through increased soil microbial activity (Abbasi et al. 2002). Together, these factors could explain the remarkably synergetic effects of the combined treatment on the growth parameters of tomato plants. In fact, improved growth enhances the resistance of plants to the detrimental effects of infection-related stress while promoting plant health and decreasing harvest losses (Ahemad and Kibret 2014; Grobelak et al. 2015).

Our results showed that POD and PPO activities were higher in tomato plants treated with different bioorganic compounds than that in the non-treated infected plants. Furthermore, their activities were remarkably higher in plants treated with KSU-110 + organic compost than in those receiving either treatment alone. In fact, POD is a key enzyme that participates in lignin biosynthesis. It also catalyzes reactive oxygen species generated in plant tissues caused by pathogen attack (Caverzan et al. 2012). Furthermore, PPO is another plant defense enzyme responsible for the oxidation of phenolic compounds into anti-microbial quinones in plant tissues attacked by plant pathogens, thereby inducing disease resistance (Arora and Bajaj 1985). Therefore, integrated application of KSU-110 + compost had likely induced defense responses of POD and PPO that might have increased tomato plant tolerance against FOL stress. These results are consistent with those of Krause et al. (2003) and Kloepper et al. (2004) who revealed that the application of Bacillus strains and compost amendments induced systemic disease resistance in affected plants.

Determining the population density of both biocontrol agents and pathogens in the plant rhizosphere is important in predicting the success of biological control (Leandro et al. 2007). Notably, KSU-110 could efficiently colonize the tomato rhizosphere and persist at a high level in the treated soils. In fact, extensive colonization of the plant rhizosphere by inoculant rhizobacteria was essential for its biocontrol and growth-promoting activities (Bouizgarne 2013; Abdallah et al. 2018). We showed that plants with reduced wilt disease incidence had an increased KSU-110 population and decreased FOL-30 population. Importantly, mixing KSU-110 + organic compost resulted in additive activity in the reduction of the FOL-30 population compared with that of their separate application. Moreover, the KSU-110 could be was attributed to the additional nutrients supplied by the amended compost. This suggests that competition for nutrients and space may be the key mechanism for biocontrol of the pathogen by KSU-110. The additional organic substrates enhanced the competitive action of KSU-110 and its survival in the tomato rhizosphere. Taken together, these findings may explain why the combined treatment was more effective in decreasing wilt disease than the application of KSU-110 alone. The results are consistent with those of previous studies showing that compost amendments positively enhanced microbial biomass and activity in the plant rhizosphere and resulted in a deleterious competitive environment for pathogens (Hadar and Papadopoulou 2012; Bahramisharif et al. 2013).

 

Conclusion

 

Our findings highlight the advantages of deploying native antagonistic bacteria for crop health and management in arid regions. The application of KSU-110 decreased the FOL-30 population in the tomato rhizosphere and hence could be a potential biological control agent against FOL. Furthermore, the combination of KSU-110 and compost greatly enhanced disease suppression and enhanced tomato growth under both greenhouse and field conditions. Further evaluations are needed to verify the efficacy of combining KSU-110 with compost against diverse soil-borne pathogens under a wider range of field conditions, before commencing any large-scale application.

 

Acknowledgments

 

We thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through research group no. RG-1440-029.

 

References

 

Abbasi P, J Al-Dahmani, F Sahin, H Hoitin, S. Miller (2002). Effect of compost amendments on disease severity and yield of tomato in conventional and organic production systems. Plant Dis 86:156‒161

Abdallah DB, O Frikha-Gargouri, S. Tounsi (2018). Rizhospheric competence, plant growth promotion and biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subspp. plantarum strain 32a. Biol Contr 124:61‒67

Ahemad M, M Kibret (2014). Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Univ Sci 26:1‒20

Arora Y, K Bajaj (1985). Peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase associated with, induced resistance of mung bean to Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. J Phytopathol 114:325‒331

Bahramisharif A, SC Lamprecht, F Calitz, A McLeod (2013). Suppression of Pythium and Phytophthora damping-off of rooibos by compost and a combination of compost and nonpathogenic Pythium Taxa. Plant Dis 97:1605‒1610

Bergey DH, RE Buchanan, NE Gibbons (1974). Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins Co, Baltimore, USA

Bouizgarne B (2013). Bacteria for plant growth promotion and disease management. In: Bacteria in Agrobiology: Disease Management, pp: 15‒47. Maheshwari D (Ed.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany

Bubici G, M Kaushal, MI Prigigallo, CGL Cabanás, J Mercado-Blanco (2019). Biological control agents against Fusarium wilt of banana. Front Microbiol 10; Article 616

Caverzan A, G Passaia, SB Rosa, CW Ribeiro, F Lazzarotto, M Margis-Pinheiro (2012). Plant responses to stresses: role of ascorbate peroxidase in the antioxidant protection. Genet Mol Biol 35:1011‒1019

Coventry E, R Noble, A Mead, FR Marin, JA Perez, JM Whipps (2006). Allium white rot suppression with composts and Trichoderma viride in relation to sclerotia viability. Phytopathology 96:1009‒1020

Dukare AS, R Prasanna, SC Dubey, L Nain, V Chaudhary, R Singh, AK Saxena (2011). Evaluating novel microbe amended composts as biocontrol agents in tomato. Crop Prot 30:436‒442

El_Komy MH, AA Saleh, YE Ibrahim, YK Hamad, YY Molan (2016). Trichoderma asperellum strains confer tomato protection and induce its defense-related genes against the Fusarium wilt pathogen. Trop Plant Pathol 41:277‒287

FAO, 2017. FAOSTAT. Online publication. http://www.fao.org/faostat

Figueroa-López AM, JD Cordero-Ramírez, JC Martínez-Álvarez, M López-Meyer, GJ Lizárraga-Sánchez, R Félix-Gastélum, IE Maldonado-Mendoza (2016). Rhizospheric bacteria of maize with potential for biocontrol of Fusarium verticillioides. SpringerPlus 5; Article 330

Finckh MR, AHV Bruggen, L Tamm (2015). Plant Diseases and Their Management in Organic Agriculture. APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

Gava CAT, JM Pinto (2016). Biocontrol of melon wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum Schlect f. spp. melonis using seed treatment with Trichoderma spp. and liquid compost. Biol Cont 97:13‒20

Gomez KA, AA Gomez (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA

Grobelak A, A Napora, M. Kacprzak (2015). Using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve plant growth. Ecol Eng 84:22‒28

Hadar Y, KK Papadopoulou (2012). Suppressive composts: microbial ecology links between abiotic environments and healthy plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:133‒153

Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95‒98

Hartmann M, S Khalil, T Bernet, F Ruhland, A Al Ghamdi (2012). Organic agriculture in Saudi Arabia-sector study 2012, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GmbH), Saudi Organic Framing Association (SOFA), Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) and Ministry of Agriculture (MoA), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Heuer H, M Krsek, P Baker, K Smalla, EM Wellington (1997). Analysis of actinomycete communities by specific amplification of genes encoding 16S rRNA and gel-electrophoretic separation in denaturing gradients. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:3233‒3241

Hibar K, M Daami-Remadi, W Hamada, M El-Mahjoub (2006). Bio-fungicides as an alternative for tomato Fusarium crown and root rot control. Tunis J Plant Prot 1:19‒29

Horinouchi H, N Katsuyama, Y Taguchi, M Hyakumachi (2008). Control of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato in a soil system by combination of a plant growth-promoting fungus, Fusarium equiseti, and biodegradable pots. Crop Prot 27:859‒864

Huang X, L Chen, W Ran, Q Shen, X Yang (2011). Trichoderma harzianum strain SQR-T37 and its bio-organic fertilizer could control Rhizoctonia solani damping-off disease in cucumber seedlings mainly by the mycoparasitism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:741‒755

Hussain G, A Alquwaizany, A Al-Zarah (2010). Guidelines for irrigation water quality and water management in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: an overview. J Appl Sci 10:79‒96

Jangir M, R Pathak, S Sharma, S Sharma (2018). Biocontrol mechanisms of Bacillus sp., isolated from tomato rhizosphere, against Fusarium oxysporum f. spp. lycopersici. Biol Cont 123:60‒70

Kloepper JW, CM Ryu, S Zhang (2004). Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94:1259‒1266

Komada H. (1975). Development of a selective medium for quantitative isolation of Fusarium oxysporum from natural soils. Rev Plant Prot Res 8:114‒125

Krause MS, TJJD Ceuster, SM Tiquia, FC Michel, LVJ Madden, HAJ Hoitink (2003). Isolation and characterization of rhizobacteria from composts that suppress the severity of bacterial leaf spot of radish. Phytopathology 93:1292‒1300

Leandro LFS, T Guzman, LM Ferguson, GE Fernandez, FJ Louws (2007). Population dynamics of Trichoderma in fumigated and compost-amended soil and on strawberry roots. Appl Soil Ecol 35:237‒246

Leslie JF, BA Summerell (2006). The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, Iowa, USA

Levy Y, M Benderly, Y Cohen, U Gisi, D Bassand (1986). The joint action of fungicides in mixtures: Comparison of two methods for synergy calculation. EPPO Bull 16:651‒657

Li B, LH Xu, MM Lou, F Li, YD Zhang, GL Xie (2008). Isolation and characterization of antagonistic bacteria against bacterial leaf spot of Euphorbia pulcherrima. Lett Appl Microbiol 46:450‒455

Müller T, S Ruppel, U Behrendt, P Lentzsch, MEH Müller (2018). Antagonistic potential of fluorescent pseudomonads colonizing wheat heads against mycotoxin producing alternaria and fusaria. Front Microbiol 9; Article 2124

Saleh, AA, AH Sharafaddin, MH El_Komy, YE Ibrahim, YK Hamad, YY Molan (2017). Fusarium species associated with date palm in Saudi Arabia. Eur J Plant Pathol 148:367‒377

Sambrook J, EF Fritsch, T Maniatis (1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, USA

SAS Institute Inc (2003). SAS/STATA Guide for Personal Computers Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Carry, North Carolina, USA

Schmidt CS, F Agostini, AM Simon, J Whyte, J Townend, C Leifert, K Killham, C Mullins (2004). Influence of soil type and pH on the colonisation of sugar beet seedlings by antagonistic Pseudomonas and Bacillus strains and on their control of Pythium damping-off. Eur J Plant Pathol 110:1025‒1046

Shirinbayan S, H Khosravi, MJ Malakouti (2019). Alleviation of drought stress in maize (Zea mays) by inoculation with Azotobacter strains isolated from semi-arid regions. Appl Soil Ecol 133:138‒145

Soussi A, R Ferjani, R Marasco, A Guesmi, H Cherif, E Rolli, F Mapelli, HI Ouzari, D Daffonchio, A Cherif (2016). Plant-associated microbiomes in arid lands: diversity, ecology and biotechnological potential. Plant Soil 405:357‒370

Termorshuizen AJ, EV Rijn, DJVD Gaag, C Alabouvette, Y Chen, J Lagerlöf, AA Malandrakis, EJ Paplomatas, B Rämert, J Ryckeboer, C Steinberg, S Zmora-Nahum (2006). Suppressiveness of 18 composts against 7 pathosystems: Variability in pathogen response. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2461‒2477

Tuzun S, MN Rao, U Vogeli, CL Schardl, JA Ku (1989). Induced systemic resistance to blue mold: early induction and accumulation of beta-1,3-gluconases, chitinase and other pathogenesis-related proteins (b-proteins) in immunized tobacco. Phytopathology 79:979‒983

Youssef SA, KA Tartoura, GA Abdelraouf (2016). Evaluation of Trichoderma harzianum and Serratia proteamaculans effect on disease suppression, stimulation of ROS-scavenging enzymes and improving tomato growth infected by Rhizoctonia solani. Biol Cont 100:79‒86